翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ De Munt
・ De Musset's sign
・ De Mysteriis Dom Sathanas
・ De México llegó el amor
・ De mí
・ De Mí Enamórate
・ De Música Ligera
・ De Mûnts, Buitenpost
・ De Naald, Apeldoorn
・ De Naald, Heemstede
・ De Nadie
・ De nakomer
・ De Nardi
・ De natis ultra mare
・ De Nattergale
De Natura Deorum
・ De Natura Fossilium
・ De Natura Sonoris
・ De Nederlanden
・ De Nederlanden (restaurant)
・ De Nederlandsche Bank
・ De Nederlandse Courant
・ De Nederlandse poëzie van de 19de en 20ste eeuw in 1000 en enige gedichten
・ De Negri
・ De Neufville baronets
・ De Neve Square Park
・ De nietsnut
・ De Nieuwe Avonturen van Dik Trom
・ De Nieuwe en Onbekende Weereld
・ De Nieuwe Gids


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

De Natura Deorum : ウィキペディア英語版
De Natura Deorum

''De Natura Deorum'' (''On the Nature of the Gods'') is a philosophical dialogue by Roman orator Cicero written in 45 BC. It is laid out in three books, each of which discuss the theology of different Roman and Greek philosophers. The dialogue uses a discussion of Stoic, Epicurean, and skeptical theories to examine fundamental questions of theology.
==Description==
The dialogue is on the whole narrated by Cicero himself, though he does not play an active part in the discussion. Gaius Velleius represents the Epicurean school, Quintus Lucilius Balbus argues for the Stoics, and Gaius Cotta speaks for Cicero's own Academic skepticism. The first book of the dialogue contains Cicero's introduction, Velleius' case for the Epicurean theology and Cotta's criticism of Epicureanism. Book II focuses on Balbus' explanation and defense of Stoic theology. Book III lays out Cotta's criticism of Balbus' claims. Cicero's conclusions are ambivalent and muted, "a strategy of civilized openness;"〔Stephen Greenblatt, ''The Swerve: How the World Became Modern'', 2011:69ff.〕 he does, however, conclude that Balbus' claims, in his mind, more nearly approximate the truth (3.95).
This work, although not written by an orthodox Epicurean or Stoic, is important because it supplements the scant primary texts that remain from Epicureans or Stoics discussing their views on religion and theology. In particular, heated scholarly debate has focussed on this text's discussion at 1.43-44 of how the Epicurean gods may be said to "exist;" David Sedley, for example, holds that Epicureans, as represented in this text and elsewhere, think that "gods are our own graphic idealization of the life to which we aspire,"〔David Sedley, ''Epicurus’ Theological Innatism.” In Fish and Saunders 2011: 29-52.'', 2011:29.〕 whereas David Konstan maintains that “the Epicurean gods are real, in the sense that they exist as atomic compounds and possess the properties that pertain to the concept, or prolēpsis, that people have of them."〔David Konstan, ''Epicurus on the Gods.” In Fish and Saunders 2011: 53-71.'', 2011:53.〕
This work, alongside ''De Officiis'' and ''De Divinatione'' was highly influential on the philosophes of the 18th century; Voltaire called it "perhaps the best book of all antiquity".〔Peter Gay, ''The Enlightenment - The Rise of Modern Paganism'', W.W. Norton & Company, 1995, p. 109.〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「De Natura Deorum」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.